SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Cal) 7

SUBHAS CHANDRA SEN, BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
BURDWAN WHOLESALE CONSUMERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


SUHAS CHANDRA SEN, J.

( 1 ) THE Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this court under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 :"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in declining to allow the benefit of carry forward and set off of the losses for the earlier assessment years on the ground that returns of income for those assessment years were not furnished in terms of Section 139 although they were furnished in terms of notice under Section 148 ?"

( 2 ) THE facts of the case, as stated by the Tribunal, are as follows : "for the assessment years 1970-71, 1971-72 and 1972-73, income-tax assessments were completed under Section 143 (3) determining losses as stated below: Assessment year Loss Rs.  

1970-71 29,656

1971-72 14,072

1972-73 41,819

 

( 3 ) THERE was no assessment for the assessment year 1974-75. For the assessment year 1975-76, the Income-tax Officer, A-Ward, Burdwan, made an assessment determining an income of Rs. 74,828. On a prayer of the assessee, the said officer declined to set off the losses for the years mentioned above against the above income for this year on the ground that the assess
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top