SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Cal) 38

S.K.MUKHERJEE
AJOY KUMAR BASU – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.CHATTERJEE, ABDULLA RAHAMANI, P.R.MONDAL, RITA MUKHERJEE, SAMAPTI CHATTERJI, TANUSHREE CHANDA

S. K. MOOKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE present writ application is at the instance of a Medical Practitioner with prayers for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the Central Bureau of Investigation to take up the charge of investigation into the death of the petitioner's son Dr. Amitava Basu. It appears that the substance of the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner is for reopening cases wherein final reports have been substituted upon finding that the death of the petitioner's son was due to accidents drowning From the materials on record it appears that the applications for reopening of the cases are pending before the Magistracies of West Bengal as also, of Orissa (Annexures 'a' and 'b' to A/o. of K. Kanjilal dated 28. 11. 88 ). Mr. A. P. Chatterjee, appearing in support of the writ application, has strongly banked upon the provisions of section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and has also draw the attention of this Court to various types of factual inconsistencies and anomalies which, 'according to him, establish unequivocally the perfunctory manner in which the investigations, ending with the final reports referred to above, conducted by the police authorities of the St





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top