AJIT KUMAR NAYAK
LAXMI MANI DASI – Appellant
Versus
MANIK CHANDRA DAS – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal by the plaintiff/appellant involves only a short question, of law as to whether a suit can be disposed of finally on the point of res judicata under Order 14 Rule 2 CPC treating as a bar to the suit created by law under clause (b) of sub-role (2) of Rule 2 of Order 14 CPC. After careful consideration, I have no hesitation to hold that when the facts are admitted, a question which has been decided fully and anally being an issue, directly and substantially, in the previous suit as in the present suit, it, no doubt, stands as, a bar to the subsequent suit, and in that case, res judicata also operates as a bar to the suit created by law as contemplated under clause (b) of sub-rule (2) of Rule 2 of Order 14 CPC.
( 2 ) TO elucidate this point of law, let us refer to the facts of this case. The present suit, out of which this appeal arises, being Title Suit No. 166 of 1979 is the Second Court of Munsif, Jangipur has been brought by Laxmi Mani Dasi for declaration of her title to the suit property, comprising plot No. 23 of Khatian No, 199 of Mouza Kaiyor, and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant/respondent Manik Chandra Das from disturbin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.