SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 217

A.K.SENGUPTA
MAHAMED SAYEED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


AJIT KUMAR SENGUPTA, J.


( 1 ) IN this application under Art. 226 of the Constitution the petitioner has challenged the decision of the respondent authorities in not allowing the petitioner to import Human Skeletons and parts thereof.

( 2 ) SHORTLY stated the facts are that the petitioner carries on business of export and import. The chief business of the petitioner is export of Human anatomical specimens i. e. Human Skeletons and or parts thereof. The petitioner is a member of the Association of the Exporters for Anatomical specimen, registered in the financial year 1976-77. The petitioner as also the other members of the said Association are exporters of Human anatomical specimens which are used for the Study of Anatomy and Biology by different Medical and research and or educational institutions in different parts of the world. The purchasers of such human anatomical specimens include American, Japanese, European, Australian, and Far East organisations. The foreign exchange earnings of the petitioner have been considerable. Data of the said foreign exchange earning of the petitioner for 3 recent years is given below :

1983-84 U. S. S. T. G. 2,44,283. 00 390. 00

1984-85 U.







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top