BIMAL CHANDRA BASAK, ABANI MOHAN SINHA
INDIAN IRON AND STEEL CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SUTNA STONE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against an order passed by learned trial Judge whereby the application made by the appellant herein for setting aside the award passed by the Tribunal of Arbitration of the Bengal Chamber of Commerce and Industry was dismissed. FACTS
( 2 ) THE brief facts of this case are as follows : there was an agreement between the appellant and the respondent whereby the respondent agreed to sell to the appellant lime stone from the existing mines of the respondent at Satna Siding at Satna in Madhya Pradesh.
( 3 ) CLAUSE 19 of the said agreement provided an arbitration clause which is as follows :-"19 Arbitration, should any dispute or difference arise between the parties in regard to the construction, effect or meaning of anything in this agreement, such difference will be referred to the Tribunal of Arbitration of the Bengal Chamber of Commerce and the decision of such Tribunal shall be binding on the parties and the provisions of the Indian Arbitration Act will govern such Arbitration. "
( 4 ) DISPUTE and differences arose between the appellant and the respondent. By a letter dated 26/12/1983 the respondents herein requested the Bangal
REFERRED TO : Food Corporation of India v. Joginderpal Mohiderpal
Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Mst Katiji
State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Thakur Ganga Sing
D.L.Miller and Co. Ltd. v. Daluram Goganmull
Banwarilal Garodia v. Joylal Hargulal
Juggilal Kamlapat v. General Fibre Dealers Ltd.
Premchand Manikchand v. Fort Gloster Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.