SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 373

BIMAL CHANDRA BASAK, ABANI MOHAN SINHA
INDIAN IRON AND STEEL CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SUTNA STONE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIMAL CHANDRA BASAK, ABANI MOHAN SINHA

BIMAL CHANDRA BASAK, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against an order passed by learned trial Judge whereby the application made by the appellant herein for setting aside the award passed by the Tribunal of Arbitration of the Bengal Chamber of Commerce and Industry was dismissed. FACTS

( 2 ) THE brief facts of this case are as follows : there was an agreement between the appellant and the respondent whereby the respondent agreed to sell to the appellant lime stone from the existing mines of the respondent at Satna Siding at Satna in Madhya Pradesh.

( 3 ) CLAUSE 19 of the said agreement provided an arbitration clause which is as follows :-"19 Arbitration, should any dispute or difference arise between the parties in regard to the construction, effect or meaning of anything in this agreement, such difference will be referred to the Tribunal of Arbitration of the Bengal Chamber of Commerce and the decision of such Tribunal shall be binding on the parties and the provisions of the Indian Arbitration Act will govern such Arbitration. "

( 4 ) DISPUTE and differences arose between the appellant and the respondent. By a letter dated 26/12/1983 the respondents herein requested the Bangal




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top