SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Cal) 34

A.K.SEN, S.N.SANYAL
DEBABRATA MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
KALYAN KUMAR RAY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.MITRA, DEBA PRASAD MUKHERJI, Kartick Bhattacharyya, RAMENDRA NATH DUTT, S.P.ROYCHOWDHURY

ANIL K. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the plaintiff and is directed against the judgment and decree dated November 24, 1981, passed by the learned Judge, 2nd Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta in Title Suit No. 999 of 1980. That was a suit under Section 49 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 as adopted for the State of West Bengal. By the judgment under appeal, the learned Judge has dismissed the suit on a preliminary issue holding the suit to be barred by principles of res judicata and the only point raised now before us is how for the learned Judge is right in his conclusion as such. It would be necessary to refer to the facts with reference to which such a plea was raised and those are set out shortly as fellows :

( 2 ) THE defendant-respondent Kalyan Kumar Roy (hereinafter referred to as the defendant) was admittedly the tenant in respect of the suit premises, being Suit No. 18 on the 3rd floor of premises No. 26, Chowringhee Road, Calcutta, under the Official Trustee of West Bengal as the Trustee to the Trust Murshidabad Estate (hereinafter referred to as the Official Trustee ). In the year 1974, the Official Trustee instituted Ejectment Suit No. 1152 of 1974 a




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top