SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Cal) 190

A.K.SEN, S.N.SANYAL
BHAGIRATHI CO-OPERATIVE JOINT FARMING SOCIETY LTD – Appellant
Versus
HOWRAH ZILLA PARISHAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANUPAM KUMAR CHATTERAJEE, BHASKAR GHOSH, M.BHATTACHARJI, Moloy Kumar Basu, NARANARAYAN GUPTA

ANIL K. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India at the instance of Bhagira-thi Co-operative Joint Farming Society (hereinafter referred to as the defendant) and is directed against an order dated October 12, 1982, passed by the West Bengal Co-operative Tribunal, dismissing an appeal under Section 134 of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), The opposite party Howrah Zilla Pari-shad (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) preferred a dispute under Section 86 of the said Act before the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Howrah. The dispute so raised was to the effect that the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant cooperative society for purchase of 3,00,000 bricks from the society and they paid the price thereof being a sum of Rs. 34,500/- but the defendant society delivered only 1,74,000 pieces of bricks. and failed and neglected to deliver the balance 1,26,000 pieces of bricks. Hence, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant must deliver the said balance pieces of bricks or in the alternative pay damages to the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE dispute thus raised be















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top