CHITTATOSH MUKHERJEE
NILSIN COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner-firm, since the year 1965, had been manufacturing "ultramarine blue" at its factory at 59, Grand Trunk Road, Liluah, District Howrah. The petitioner-firm had taken out requisite licence for manufacturing excisable goods and had also executed necessary bond under the Central Excise Rules, inter alia, undertaking to produce for charge of duty all excisable goods manufactured in its factory, to maintain accounts and to pay excise duty leviable thereon, etc. Both the petitioner and the Central excise authorities, until the time mentioned hereinafter, had acted on the basis that ultramarine blue manufactured by the petitioner was included within Item No. 141 (5) of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The petitioner was being assessed under Section 3 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, in respect of ultramarine blue according to the rate of duty mentioned against the goods specified in Item No. 141 (5) of the First Schedule to the said Act.
( 2 ) ON 20th August, 1971, a learned Judge of the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, had decreed a civil suit brought by M/s. C. M. C. India, inter alia, for declaring that th
Referred to : Ramavatar Budhaiprasad v. Assistant Sales Tax Officer, Akola
Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P. v. Jaswant Singh
Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. v. Ladha Singh
State of U.P. v. Indian Hume Pipe Co.
Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax v. G.S.Pai Co.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.