SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Cal) 297

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, SUHAS C.SEN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
STANTON AND STAVELY (OVERSEAS) LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.Bagchi, B.K.NAHA, K.ROY, R.N.Dutt

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 256 (1) of the I. T. Act, 1961, the following question has been referred to this court:"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the amounts described as 'commission' in the agreement dated 9th October, 1956, between the asses-see and the Indian Iron and Steel Co. were in the nature of royalties and fees covered by the exemption provided in Rule l (ix) and Rule l (x) of the First Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, and were liable to be excluded from the total income of the assessee in computing the chargeable profits for the assessment years 1965-66, 1966-67, 1967-68 and 1969-70?"

( 2 ) THIS reference arises out of the assessment for the assessment years 1965-66, 1966-67, 1967-68 and 1969-70 under the provisions of the C. (P.) S. T. Act, 1964. Now it would be relevant to refer to the relevant provisions of the said Act. The First Schedule to the said Act" provides rules for computing the chargeable profits under the provisions of that Act. Rule I stipulates that income, profits and gains and other sums falling within the-clauses ment































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top