SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Cal) 42

CHITTATOSH MUKHERJEE, RAMKRISHNA SHARMA
SANDHYA BHATTACHARJEE – Appellant
Versus
GOPINATH BHATTACHARJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.C.GHOSH, M.M.MALIK, S.K.GHOSAL, S.N.TAGORE

CHITTATOSH MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant-wife preferred this appeal against the decision of the learned Additional District Judge, 1st Court, Howrah, dismissing her petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights and also her prayer for payment of permanent alimony under Section 25 of the said Act.

( 2 ) ON 11th Aug. , 1975 the marriage between the appellant and the respondent according to Hindu rites was solemnised at Ramji Hazra Lane, P. S. Sibpur, Dist. Howrah. The respondent and his two brothers had their dwelling house at 19/1, R. N. T. Road, Harinabhi, P. S. Sonarpur. Dist. 24 Parganas. Since her marriage up to 26th Sept. , 1976 the appellant, Sandhya, had lived in the said joint household of the respondent and his two brothers at Harinabhi. Sonarpur. The respondent, Gopinath, was an employee of Dunlop and Co. Ltd. He himself, resided in a bachelor's staff quarter of the said company at Shahgunj, Dist. Hooghly and visited his home at Sonarpur for one or two days every week. During the said period the appellant-petitioner, at intervals visited and stayed at her father's house at Sibpur, District Howrah. But there is some disput














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top