SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Cal) 326

A.K.SEN, S.N.SANYAL
DEBABRATA TARAFDER – Appellant
Versus
BIRAJ MOHAN BARDHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.G.SHAH, R.N.MITTAL, Sudhis Das Gupta, TARUN CHATTEJEE

ANIL K. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal at the instance of the judgment-debtor directed against an order dated July 9, 1982, passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Alipore, dismissing an objection under Section 47 of the C. P. C. read with Order 21, Rule 34 of the said Code. Since no appeal lies against an order dismissing an objection under Section 47 of the Code, the appellant had earlier filed an application in revision on notice to the decree-holder, being C. O. 2242 of 1982 which is being heard along with the appeal. Since the decree-holder had already entered appearance we admit the appeal, dispense with service of the notice of appeal and we proceed to dispose of both the appeal and the revisional application by this judgment of ours.

( 2 ) ON April 28, 1977 (?), the present appellant entered into an agreement with the pre-sent respondent to sell the suit property which is a demarcated part of premises No. 2, Andul Raj Road, Calcutta, and which had been allotted to the share of the appellant's father under a partition decree passed on an award in Title Suit No. 16 of 1944. The respondent instituted Title Suit No. 86 of 1976 for specific performance of that agr













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top