SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 14

BIMALENDRA NATH MAITRA
ADHIR KUMAR DAS – Appellant
Versus
JUTHIKA SEN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BANKIM CHANDRA DUTT, JNANENDRA NATH BAKSHI, PRADIPTA ROY, Sudhis Das Gupta

BIMALENDRA NATH MAITRA, J.

( 1 ) APPEAL against the decree of Shri R. C. Ghosh, Subordinate Judge of Zillah Murshidabad in Title Appeal No. 34 of 1969 dated the 24th of June, 1972, affirming the decree of Shri G. Halder, Munsif, 2nd Court Berhampore District Murshidabad dated the 10th of December, 1968.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff's case is that the defendant is her tenant regarding the disputed premises at a rental of Rs. 35/- payable ac-cording to English calendar. He has been running a printing press in that premises. From January, 1964, he has been using an electric motor with high horse-power for running the press. The result is that due to the noise and vibrations, the walk and floor of the first floor have been cracked and her heart disease has aggravated. She has no drawing room in her house for the use of her husband and son. She reasonably requires the disputed premises for using the same as her drawing room. The defendant is a defaulter. His tenancy was properly determined by a notice to quit. The suit is for ejectment.

( 3 ) THE defence is a denial of the plaintiff's allegations, it has been alleged inter alia that the notice is not valid in law. He sent rent by money-order,
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top