SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 292

PRATIBHA BONNERJEA
BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT OF LEVERKUSEN FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY – Appellant
Versus
CONTROLLER OF PATENTS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Lall, N.C.Roy Chowdhury

PRATIBHA BONNERJEA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application Under Section 71 of the Patents Act 1970 for rectification of the entry relating to Patent No. 139978 in the register of the respondent. This application is contested by the respondent.

( 2 ) IT is alleged in the petition that Chlorothio-N-Phthalimide is a novel compound and is a new intermediate product suitable for producing various products such as herbicidai compounds or auxiliary agents for rubber. This compound can also be used in the preparation of other compounds which in turn can be used in the treatment of disease in human beings and animals. But this compound by itself is not intended nor is capable of being used as a drug or medicine as defined in Section 2 (1) (1) of the Act. The respondent, however, wrongly classified this product as a 'drug' and fixed the period of the patent for 7 years from the date of the sealing. According to the petitioner the period of this novel compound should have been 14 years by virtue of the provision of Section 53 of the Act. Hence this application for rectification of the register by deleting 7 years and inserting in its place 14 years.

( 3 ) THE respondent filed an affidavit-in-opp










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top