SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 103

SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
MCLEOD AND CO. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.Bhattacharji, AJIT SEN GUPTA, N.K.PODDAR, N.N.SAHA, SUKUMAR BHATTACHARJI

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 256 (1) of the I. T. Act, 1961, two questions have been referred to this court which are as follows:" (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and on a proper interpretation of Section 2 (45), Section 80b (5) and Section 80a (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the deduction under Section 80m of the said Act should be calculated with reference to the total income and gross total income as they stood before setting off the losses under Section 71 or Section 72 of the Act ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the mistake, if any, in the allowance of relief under Section 80m in the original assessment orders was not a mistake apparent from the record that could be corrected under Section 154?"

( 2 ) SO far as the first question is concerned in view of the ratio of the decision of this court in the case of National Engineering Industries Ltd. v. CIT [1978] 113 ITR 252 and the ratio of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Cloth Traders (P.) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT , the question is answered in






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top