SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 348

SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA
CHANDRA SEKHAR SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
BAIDYANATH GHOSH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ABHIJIT BANERJI, P.N.Palit

SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein is the applicant for pre-emption under Section 8 of the Land Reforms Act in respect of the land purchased by the opposite parties on the ground of vicinage. As the application could not be filed within four months of the date of transfer as required by the Section, he filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay.

( 2 ) THE learned Munsif, 2nd Court at Arambagh by an order dated 22-3-1980 held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act had no application in a case under Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act particularly when the application is made on the ground of vicinage. So the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was rejected.

( 3 ) MR. Abhijit Kumar Baneriee, the learned Advocate for the petitioner argues that in view of Section 29 (2) of the Limitation Act, Section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable in the instant case. He further contends that there is nothing in the West Bengal Land Reforms Act excluding the provision of Limitation Act. Reference is made to the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of (1) Mangu Ram (2) M/s. Ram Parshad Gondamal v. Municipal C




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top