SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Cal) 52

A.K.SENGUPTA, SHYAMAL KUMAR SEN
S. P. JAISWAL ESTATES PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (NO. 2) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.MITRA, N.K.PODDAR, R.C.PRASAD, S.K.MITRA

AJIT K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the following questions of law have been referred by the Tribunal for the opinion of this court :

( 2 ) QUESTIONS at the instance of the assessee :"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the rate of depreciation as made applicable with effect from April 2, 1983, was not applicable for the assessment year 1983-84 in the case of the assessee ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the company was not an industrial company mainly engaged in manufacturing of goods ? 3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the rate of income-tax applicable to the company will be that applicable to a non-industrial company ? 4. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the company was not entitled to extra shift depreciation ?"

( 3 ) QUESTIONS at the instance of the Revenue :"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top