KHWAJA MOHAMMAD YUSUF
SAMIR BHATTACHARYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) ALL the four writ petitions were heard analogously and are disposed of by this Judgment.
( 2 ) THE writ petitioners joined the West Bengal Home Guard, Border Wing Home Guard, from time to time since 1978 and thereafter. The petitioners are divided into four categories of the Border Wing Home Guard, namely, Constable, Havildar, Nayek and Lance Nayek and after undergoing a training of 75 days or so they were given Certificates. Some of the petitioners are rendering services for more than 10 years, some 12-13 years, 8 and 7 years and the like, uninterruptedly or without any break. They were appointed under West Bengal Ordinance No. XI of 1962 which subsequently merged into the West Bengal Home Guards Act, 1962 with effect from 14th December, 1962. In the appointment/enrolment certificate the following is noted: "while on duty will have the same powers, functions and privileges as a Police officer appointed under Act V of 1861. " This Act V of 1861 is the Police Act, 1861 and section 8 thereof says : "every police officer appointed to the police force than an officer mentioned in section 4 shall receive on his appointment a certificate in the form annexed to thi
REFERRED TO : Bhagwan Dass and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Ors
State of West Bengal v. Kanak Chandra
Daily Rated Casual Labour employed under P. and T. Department etc. v. Union of India and Ors.
Dhirendra Chamoli and Anr., v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Delhi Transport Corporation v. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress and Ors.
Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
State of Kerala and Anr., v. N. M. Rao
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.