A.C.GUPTA, N.L.UNTWALIA, P.N.BHAGWATI, R.S.SARKARIA, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Bachan Singh: Mal Singh: Sunil Batra: Nathu Singh: Kartar Singh And Ujagar Singh: Sher Singh: Sunil Batra: Mal Singh: Nirpal Singh: Jagmohan Singh: Ujjagar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab: Union Of India: Union Of India: Union Of India: Delhi Administration: State Of Punjab: Delhi Administration: State Of Haryana: State Of Haryana: State Of Haryana: State Of Punjab – Respondent
Judgement
BHAGWATI, J. :— These writ petitions challenge the constitutional validity of S . 302 of the Penal Code read with S. 354, sub-sec. (3) of the Criminal P.C. in so far as it provides death sentence as an alternative punishment for the offence of murder. There are several grounds on which the constitutional validity of the death penalty provided in S. 302 of the Penal Code read with Section 354 sub-& (3) of the Criminal P. C. is assailed before us. but it is not necessary to set them out at this stage, for I propose to deal with them when I examine the arguments advanced on behalf of the parties. Suffice it to state for the present that I find considerable force in some of these grounds and in my view, the constitutional validity of The death penalty provided as an alternative punishment in S. 302 of the Indian Penal Code read with S. 354 sub-sec. (3) of the Code, of Criminal Procedure cannot be sustained. I am conscious that my learned brethren on the Bench who constitute the majority have taken a different view and upheld the constitutional validity of the death penalty but, with the greatest respect to them and in all humility, I cannot persuade myself to concur with the v
Raghubir Singh v. State of Haryana
Gurudas Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Bhagwan Swarup v. State of U.P
Bhoor Singh v. State of Punjab
Rishideo Pande v. State of U.P
Bharwad Mepa Dana v. State of Bombay
referred to : Raghubir Singh v. State of Haryana
Vasant Laxman More v. State of Maharashtra
relied on : Rajendra Prasad v. State of U.P
relied on : Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab
Harbans Singh v. State of U.P.
Rajendra Prasad v. State of U.P
referred to : Dalbir Singh v. State of Punjab
referred to : Babu v. State of U.P
Mukhtiar Singh v. State of Punjab
Gurcharan Singh v. State of Punjab
relied on : State of U.P. v. Samman Dass
Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Sunil Batra (I) v. Delhi Administration
Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator
relied on : Rajendra Prasad v. State of U.P
referred to : Rajendra Prasad v. State of U.P
relied on : Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Minerva Alilts Ltd. v. Union of India
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi
referred to : A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
Ram Krishna Dalmia v. S.R. Tendolkar
Mohd. Hanif Quareshi v. State of Bihar
followed : Saghir Ahmad v. State of U.P.
Khyerbari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam
explained and distinguished : Pathumma v. State of Kerala
Mohd. Hanif Quareshi v. State of Bihar
explained : Ram Krishna Dalmia v. S.R. Tendolkar
criticised : B. Banerjee v. Anita Pan
referred to : State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala
relied on : State of Madras v. V.G. Row
affirmed : R.C. Cooper v. Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
held overruled : A.K.Gopalan v. State af Madras
relied on : Shambhu Nath Sarkar v. State of W.B
K.K. Kochuni v. State of Madras
referred to : Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Dalbir Singh v. State of Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.