SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Cal) 155

S.K.MUKHERJEE, ABANI MOHAN SINHA
SHYAMA CHARAN AUDDY – Appellant
Versus
BIMALA BALA SEN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK SENGUPTA, R.MISHRA

A. M. SINHA, J, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned Assistant District Judge, 3rd Court, Alipore in Money Execution Case No. 19 of 1970 rejecting the application filed by revisionist-petitioners purported to be one for obtaining an information as to dues of the decree-holder on the money decree for the purpose of paying it off and for certain other directions. In a money suit the decree-holder obtained a decree for a sum of Rs. 6100. 00 against the revisionist-petitioner and his co-sharers. The co-sharers, it was said, agreed to pay off all their dues in the money execution case and as such they wanted to be favoured with the information of the court as to the exact amount payable by them. They stated that they were ready to pay the said dues by Challan on the next day of the supply of such information.

( 2 ) THEIR immovable property, namely, 11 cottahs of land with a two storied puce building situated at 46 and 48, R. K. Chatterjee Road, Kasba, Calcutta were attached and put to auction sale for rupees one and half lakh only on 7/07/1990. According to the petitioner, the market value of such property at the time of sale would be












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top