S.B.SINHA, RUMA PAL
SEN MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
CHHAYA BANERJEE – Respondent
( 1 ) M/s. Santosh Chandra Banerjee and Sons Private Limited (referred to as the company) was heavily indebted to the appellant. The company was under the management of the respondent's husband and father-in-law. In payment of a debt of Rs. 91,917. 65, the respondent on 3rd Nov. 1967 agreed to sell Premises No. 24/1, Mandeville Garden (referred to as the premises) to the appellant for a total consideration of Rs. 1 lakh. The premises consists of a two storyed brick built residential house and 7 cottahs, 1 chittacks and 43 sft. of land. The consideration for the sale was to be paid partly by way of adjustment of the debt of Rs. 91,917. 65 claimed by the appellant against the company and the balance sum of Rs. 9,908. 37 by cheque at the time of execution and registration of the conveyance. However, on the request of the respondent, the amount of Rs. 9,908. 37 was also made over by the appellant to the respondent.
( 2 ) THE respondent having failed to complete the sale, in 1969 the appellant filed a suit with leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent for specific performance of the agreement dated 3rd Nov. 1967, a decree for damages amounting to Rs. 15,826. 62 and f
REFERRED TO : In Punit Beriwala v. Suva Sanyal
Smt. Ranganayakamma v. N. Govinda Narayan
In Kamal Chowdhury v. Rajendra Choudhury
Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Federation Ltd. v. Sunder Bros. Delhi
Serajuddin and Co. v. Michael Goldodetz
In Shib Kumar Banerjee v. Rasul Bux
In Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha
Sukumar Bysack v. Sushil Kanta Banerjee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.