SATYABRATA SINHA
NIRANJAN NATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF W. B – Respondent
( 1 ) IN the writ application the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-" (A) A writ and/or order or orders and/or directions in the nature of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents their agents, subordinates, employees and/or transferees to issue tender form to the petitioner's firm and to permit the petitioner's firm to participate in tender of construction of 3rd Mahanada Bridge in terms of the Memo No. 440 dated 1 October, 1996 issued by the Superintending Engineer, P. W. D. , Planning Circle the respondent No. 3; (b) A Writ and/or order or orders and/or directions direction the respondents their agents, servants and subordinates directing them not to proceed with the process of tendering or accepting any tender from giving any work order to any tender or taking any further step pursuant to such acceptance of any tender : (c) A Writ and/or order or orders and/or directions in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari directing the respondents to certify to this Hon'ble Court the record of the case leading to the issuance of the tender form in terms of the abridge notice issued under Memo No. 440 dated 1 October, 1996 by the Superintending Enginee
REFERRED TO : Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Sterling Computers v. M. and N. Publications
M/s. Deepak Builders v. State of Rajasthan
Nat Steel Equipment Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise
Harminder Singh v. Union of India
Welcome Hotel v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.