SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Cal) 77

SATYABRATA SINHA
NIRANJAN NATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF W. B – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHIM ROY, BALAI CHANDRA ROY, DEBASIS KAR GUPTA, SUBRATA MUKHOPADHYAY

SATYABRATA SINGH, J.

( 1 ) IN the writ application the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-" (A) A writ and/or order or orders and/or directions in the nature of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents their agents, subordinates, employees and/or transferees to issue tender form to the petitioner's firm and to permit the petitioner's firm to participate in tender of construction of 3rd Mahanada Bridge in terms of the Memo No. 440 dated 1 October, 1996 issued by the Superintending Engineer, P. W. D. , Planning Circle the respondent No. 3; (b) A Writ and/or order or orders and/or directions direction the respondents their agents, servants and subordinates directing them not to proceed with the process of tendering or accepting any tender from giving any work order to any tender or taking any further step pursuant to such acceptance of any tender : (c) A Writ and/or order or orders and/or directions in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari directing the respondents to certify to this Hon'ble Court the record of the case leading to the issuance of the tender form in terms of the abridge notice issued under Memo No. 440 dated 1 October, 1996 by the Superintending Enginee






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top