SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 597

S.B.SINHA, MALAY KUMAR BASU
NARAYAN BAIDYA – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS (S. E. ) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMALVI RANCHOD DAS, J.K.DUBEY, PRADIP CHAKRAVARTY, UDAYAN BHATTACHARYA

S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THE question which arises for consideration in this appeal is the interpretation of the provision of section 9 of the School Service Commission Act, 1997 (West Bengal Act No. IV of 1997 ).

( 2 ) THE fact of the matter lies in a very narrow compass. The post of a teacher of English fell vacant in Baribhanga Bamacharan Vidyapith (hereinafter referred to as 'the said school' ). The Managing Committee of the said school adopted a resolution for filling up the post; wherefor a requisition was sent to District Inspector of Schools (S. E), South 24 Parganas, the prior permission wherefor was granted on 9. 12. 1996.

( 3 ) ON 17. 3. 97 interview was held and 19 candidates appeared at the interview. No panel was prepared whereafter; a writ petition was field by the respondent No. 11, which was marked as W. P. No. 18927 (W) of 1997. By an order dated 29. 9. 97, a learned Judge of this court directed the District Inspector of Schools to consider the case of the petitioner within eight weeks from the date of communication of the order and the school authority was restrained from holding any interview for filling up the said post. The Managing Committee of the school was



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top