S.B.SINHA, MALAY KUMAR BASU
NARAYAN BAIDYA – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS (S. E. ) – Respondent
( 1 ) THE question which arises for consideration in this appeal is the interpretation of the provision of section 9 of the School Service Commission Act, 1997 (West Bengal Act No. IV of 1997 ).
( 2 ) THE fact of the matter lies in a very narrow compass. The post of a teacher of English fell vacant in Baribhanga Bamacharan Vidyapith (hereinafter referred to as 'the said school' ). The Managing Committee of the said school adopted a resolution for filling up the post; wherefor a requisition was sent to District Inspector of Schools (S. E), South 24 Parganas, the prior permission wherefor was granted on 9. 12. 1996.
( 3 ) ON 17. 3. 97 interview was held and 19 candidates appeared at the interview. No panel was prepared whereafter; a writ petition was field by the respondent No. 11, which was marked as W. P. No. 18927 (W) of 1997. By an order dated 29. 9. 97, a learned Judge of this court directed the District Inspector of Schools to consider the case of the petitioner within eight weeks from the date of communication of the order and the school authority was restrained from holding any interview for filling up the said post. The Managing Committee of the school was
REFERRED TO : A.A.Calton v. The Director of Education and Anr.
Sukhdarshan Singh etc. v. State of Rajasthan
Basudeb Bag and Anr. v. Bhaskar Chandra Kar and Ors.
P.Mahendran and Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
I.J.Divakar v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Debasis Dutta v. State of West Bengal
Lalin Kumar Mahato v. State of West Bengal
The Regional Manager and Anr. v. Pawan Kumar Dubey
Mittal Engineering Works (P) Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.