S.B.SINHA, VINOD KUMAR GUPTA, P.S.MISHRA
DEBASIS DUTTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE writ applications have been referred to a larger bench by Samaresh Banerjea, J by an order dated 19th September, 1997 as His Lordship was of the opinion that the decision of the Supreme Court in Excise Superintendent, Malkapatnam, Krishna District, A. P v. K. B. N. Visweshwara Rao and Ors. reported in 1996 (3) SCC 216 and also a Division Bench judgment of this court in M. A. No. 433 of 1997 (since reported in 1997 (2) CLJ 428) cannot have any application in the facts and circumstances of the present case in view of the decision of the apex court in Union of India v. N. Hargopal and Ors. reported in 1987 (3) SCC 308. According to the learned judge although Hargopal (supra) has been noticed in Excise Superintendent, the same has not been overruled. The learned Judge was also of the view that in Excise Superintendent (supra) Their Lordships have not decided the question as to what would be the position where in a particular case the Recruitment Rules itself provides that such recruitment may be made by calling for names of the candidates from Employment Exchange. The fact of the matter may be noticed from W. P. No. 1933 of 1997 the writ petition was filed
Resindra Sharma v. State of Punjab
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Suresh K. Verma
Rajlkumar and Ors. v. Shakti Raj and Ors.
Regional Manager v. Pawan Kumar Dubey
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Gurnam Kaur
Goodyear Ltd. v. State of Haryana
Mittal Engineering Works (P) Ltd. v. Ex Collector of Central Excise, Merrut
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.