SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Cal) 216

S.B.SINHA, VINOD KUMAR GUPTA, P.S.MISHRA
DEBASIS DUTTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THESE writ applications have been referred to a larger bench by Samaresh Banerjea, J by an order dated 19th September, 1997 as His Lordship was of the opinion that the decision of the Supreme Court in Excise Superintendent, Malkapatnam, Krishna District, A. P v. K. B. N. Visweshwara Rao and Ors. reported in 1996 (3) SCC 216 and also a Division Bench judgment of this court in M. A. No. 433 of 1997 (since reported in 1997 (2) CLJ 428) cannot have any application in the facts and circumstances of the present case in view of the decision of the apex court in Union of India v. N. Hargopal and Ors. reported in 1987 (3) SCC 308. According to the learned judge although Hargopal (supra) has been noticed in Excise Superintendent, the same has not been overruled. The learned Judge was also of the view that in Excise Superintendent (supra) Their Lordships have not decided the question as to what would be the position where in a particular case the Recruitment Rules itself provides that such recruitment may be made by calling for names of the candidates from Employment Exchange. The fact of the matter may be noticed from W. P. No. 1933 of 1997 the writ petition was filed
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top