PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
NATIONAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD – Appellant
Versus
AROMA UNIVERSAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13th May, 1998 passed by the learned single judge while deciding the application filed by the appellant hereinunder sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act challenging the award made and published by the learned Arbitrator on 13th May, 1997.
( 2 ) LEARNED single Judge dismissed the application for setting aside the award filed by the appellant herein and passed a decree in terms of the award with an amendment that interest should be charged at the rate of 12% instead of 18% as was directed by the learned Arbitrator.
( 3 ) THE appellant has challenged the said judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge in the present appeal on the grounds that there was delay in preferring the claim and accordingly, Arbitrator should have rejected the claim on the ground of limitation and secondly, the Arbitrator exceeded his jurisdiction and made an award which is a nullity. According to the appellant, arbitrator had decided the disputes and awarded the claims without considering the terms of the contract properly. Learned counsel of the appellant submitted that by disregarding the terms of co
REFERRED TO : Associated Engineering Co. v. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Anr.
Rajasthan State Mines and Minerals Ltd. v. Eastern Engineering Enterprises and Anr.
B.V.Radhakrishnan, In the Matter of
M.L.Dalmia and Co. v. Union of India
Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. v. State of JandK
Wild Life Institute of India, Dehradun v. Vijay Kumar Garg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.