SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Cal) 558

SEN GUPTA
LYTTON HOTEL PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GOUTAM CHAKRABORTY

SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this writ application has challenged an order dated July 29, 1993, passed by the Appropriate Authority of the Income-tax Department, Calcutta (respondent No. 1 herein), under Section 269ud (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Act" ).

( 2 ) BY the said impugned order it has been held by the respondents that there has been understatement of apparent consideration in the property in question being premises No. 14/1, Sudder Street, Calcutta, and it was a fit case to exercise pre-emptive purchase as laid down in Chapter XX-C of the said Act.

( 3 ) THE short fact of the case is that respondent No, 5 being the present owner by and under an agreement in writing dated May 21, 1995, agreed to sell and the writ petitioner herein agreed to purchase the said property at consideration of Rs. 75. 05 lakhs subject to existing tenancy and other terms and conditions as contained in the agreement. The said property is encumbered with the monthly tenancy created by respondent No. 5 in favour of the pro forma respondents Nos. 6 and 7 who were once sought to be evicted unsuccessfully. The property in question in wakf property. So t





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top