SAMARESH BANERJEE
VYSYA BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent
( 1 ) IN both the writ petitions, which have been heard analogously, the petitioner-bank has challenged an order passed by the Appropriate Authority of Income-tax, Calcutta, under Section 269ud (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
( 2 ) AS it appears from the pleadings, the petitioner bank for the purpose of providing residential accommodation to its officers entered into two agreements with respondent No. 7, Delight Housing Corporation, for purchasing 16 flats which were under construction at premises No. 250, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Road, Tollygunj, Calcutta 47. One agreement was for purchasing eight flats on the first and second floor on the super built up area basis for a total consideration of Rs. 39,10,130, and for car parking space which was entered between the parties on April 21, 1994. 25 per cent, of the consideration, namely, Rs. 9,96,282. 50, was paid at the time of execution of the first agreement and further sum of Rs. 25,00,000 was paid leaving a balance of Rs. 4,86,847. 50 and the possession of the said eight flats was also given to the bank.
( 3 ) THE said agreement is the subject-matter of the first Writ Petition No. C. O. 8664 (W) of 1994.
REFERRED TO : C.B.Gautam v. Union of India
Laboni Developers v. Appropriate Authority
Associated Cement Cos. Ltd. v. Appropriate Authority
Dwarkanath Chatterjee v. Union of India
Chandrika Apartments Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
Hari Krishna Kanoi v. Appropriate Authority
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.