SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 488

PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY
SANTOSH KUMAR MAZUMDAR – Appellant
Versus
REKHA BOSE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK MAJUMDAR, Jotirmoy Bhattacharya, RUDRANIL DEY

PRANAB KUMAR CHATTOPADHYAY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and decree both dated 2nd August, 1996 passed by the Learned Additional District Judge, Second Court, Howrah in Title Appeal No. 171 of 1991 affirming the judgment and decree both dated 27th May, 1991 passed by the learned Munsif, Third Court, Howrah in Title Suit No. 315 of 1985. The suit was filed by the Plaintiff/respondent as the owner of the holding No. 36 Rajballav Saha Lane, Howrah on several grounds including the grounds of default, building and re-building of the suit premises and also for causing damage to the suit premises and thereby violating the provisions of clauses (m), (o) and (p) of Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act.

( 2 ) ). The plaintiff/ landlord mentioned in the plaint that the defendant/tenant raised unauthorised permanent construction in the suit premises and also neglected to pay the monthly rent. The contention of the plaintiff is that the suit premises require urgent re-construction on eviction of the tenant as the same is in dilapidated condition. The defendant appellant contested the claims of the plaintiff mentioned in the plaint and opposed the prayer of evict






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top