SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Cal) 76

DEBIPRASAD SENGUPTA
SANTOSH KUMAR KARMAKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DEBASIS ROY, MILON MUKHARJI, MONORANJAN BASU, RITU ARORA

DEBIPRASAD SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application is directed against the judgment and order dated 12-8-92 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd Court, Midnapore in Criminal Appeal No. 32 of 1991 thereby affirming the judgment and order dated 27-2-91 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Court, Midnapore in U. R. Case No. 254 of 1982 (T. R. 269/83) convicting the accused petitioners under Section 3 (a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act and sentencing each of them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution is that on 15-8-82 at about 16. 30 hours P. Ws. 1, 2, 3 and 4 held an ambush, when they found accused Gurucharan Pasi and Nikhil Chandra Pramanick to carry one brake-beam and to enter into an incomplete structure of bricks having no roof. They followed them and caught red-handed with the said brake beam. Entering into the said structure they found another person named Shib Charan Pasi handling with railway materials. On being asked none of those persons could produce any valid document in support of their possession of such railway materials. All the three accused were arrested and the railway materi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top