TARUN CHATTERJEE, MAHEMMAD HABEEB SHAMS ANSARI, Y.R.MEENA
AHAMED HOSSAIN SK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THE facts in brief as can be gleaned from the order of the learned single Judge, are as under.
( 2 ) PURSUANT to a notice dated November 5, 1996, petitioner applied for appointment as modified ration dealer (M. R. Dealer ). Concerned Inspector (F and S) appears to have held spot enquiry with respect to the candidates including the petitioner and submitted the report before the Sub Divisional Controller. The Area Chief Inspector considered the report and expressed his opinion thereon. The Sub Divisional Controller then furnished the applications, annexure thereto, report of inspection, the opinion of Area Chief Inspector as well as his personal opinion to the Karmadakshya, Khadya-O-Sarabaraha Stayee Samity of Chapra Panchayet Samity. Though the said papers were placed before the said Samity in June, 1998, but no decision was taken thereon and, therefore, the writ application being W. P. No. 17346 (W) of 1998 was filed.
( 3 ) THE learned Judge was of the following opinion;"in the normal course I would have disposed of this writ petition by directing the concerned Khadyo-O-Sarabaraha Stayee Samity and in its absence the Sabhapati thereof to decide upon the
REFERRED TO : Ram Jankijee Deities and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors.
Tara Dutta v. The State and Anr.
Prafulla Kumar Dutta v. Ganesh Chandra Bose and Anr.
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd.
Md.Ataur Rahaman Khan v. Mohd. Kamaluddin Ahmed
Mahadeolal Kanodia v. Administrator General of West Bengal
Lala Shri Bhagwan v. Ram Chand
Union of India v. Radhubir Singh
Sunderjas Kanyalal Bhatijia v. The Collector, Thane, Maharastra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.