SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Cal) 528

NARAYAN CHANDRA SIL
CASH REGISTER CO (P) LTD – Appellant
Versus
SURAJ NARAYAN SHAW – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.R.CHATTERJI, Sudhis Das Gupta, UDAYAN DUTTA

N. C. SIL, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the judment and order dated 21. 3. 2002 passed by Shri R. K. Dey, learned Judge, City Civil Court, VIIth Bench in connection with Misc. Case No. 1332 of 2001 arising out of Title Execution Case No. 50 of 2000.

( 2 ) IT appears from the impugned order that as many as three applications were filed by the petitioner/judgment-debtor before the learned lower Court. In one application under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure the petitioner prayed for stay of all further proceedings of Title Execution Case No. 50 of 2000. In other application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code the petitioner prayed for temporary injunction against the O. P. s/decree-holders and in application under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure the petitioner prayed for stay of all proceedings of the said Title Execution Case number. After hearing both the parties the learned Judge rejected all the three applications.

( 3 ) IT appears from the record that the O. Ps. got a decree in title suit No. 1323 of 1981 on 29. 4. 1985 against which the petitioner preferred an appeal before












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top