SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Cal) 416

D.K.SETH, JYOTESH BANERJEE
DHIRENDRA NATH DAS – Appellant
Versus
SHRIMATI MENOKA DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GOPAL CH.MUKHERJEE, TAPAN KUMAR MUKHERJEE

D. K. SETH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against order No. 100 dated 17th April, 2000 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Divsion, Durgapur in Title Suit No. 61 of 1995. Facts:

( 2 ) THE plaintiff, in a suit for partition, is the appellant before this Court. The case has a chequered career. An application for appointment of Receiver filed by the plaintiff was allowed by the learned trial Court by an order dated 23rd May, 1996. One learned advocate was appointed Receiver by an order dated 20th June, 1996. The learned advocate had signified his unwillingness on 31st July, 1996. The sole defendant was appointed Receiver by an order dated 7th August 1996. Against the order dated 23rd May 1996 and 20th June 1996, the sole defendant preferred FMAT No. 2189 of 1996. This appeal was dismissed by this Court by an order dated 10th September 1996. In the said order, the Receiver was directed to deposit 50% of the collection in Court every month and to file quarterly statement of account. The trial Court by an order dated 7th February 1997 directed the Receiver to deposit 50% of the total collection in Court, in default the Receiver would be removed and one of the plaintiffs would b










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top