SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Cal) 607

SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE
MERCURY TRAVELS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MD.NIZAMUDDIN, PRATIMA MISHRA, R.N.BAJORIA, SUNIL KUMAR MUKHERJI

SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE,J.

( 1 ) IN this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India (the writ petition in short), the writ petitioner questioned three notices issued under Section 148 of the IT Act, 1961 (the said Act in short), dt. 26th Sept. , 1996, for the asst. yrs. 1989-90 and 1990-91 and dt. 20th Sept. , 1996, for the asst. yr. 1991-92.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts for the disposal of the writ petition are summarised as under: (a) The petitioner, a public limited company, is engaged in businesses of travel agency and tour operation. The petitioner is an agent of the airlines for selling air tickets and for rendering such services, it receives commission from such airlines. Similarly, the petitioner acts as an agent for various hotels and it gets commission from such hotels for booking accommodations on behalf of the clients of the petitioner. Apart from the aforesaid businesses of acting as the agent of airlines and of hotels, the writ petitioner, also carries on business of tour operation. The writ petitioner, however, receives only the amount of commission, which the writ petitioner is entitled to receive from the said airlines and the hotels for rendering its












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top