AMITAVA LALA
KAL ELECTRONIC AND CONSULTANCY (P. ) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. – Respondent
( 1 ) DEFENDANT No. 1 is a company having financial stringency. Defendant No. 3 company is a going concern. This is a joint application of both the companies. The plaintiff-company is the debenture holder of defendant No. 1 company. The convertible part of such debentures has already been converted into equity shares and the non-convertible part has been redeemed. Defendant No. 2 is the trustee bank of the debenture holders.
( 2 ) UPON observing recent recession in the steel industry defendant No. 1 and defendant No. 3 wanted to make arrangement amongst themselves. As a result whereof an application for consideration and confirmation of the scheme of arrangement was jointly made before this High Court having company jurisdiction. Shareholders of both the companies were directed to hold separate meetings. The shareholders of both the companies by an overwhelming majority accorded approval of the scheme of arrangement. Subsequently, a joint application was made under Section 391 (2) of the Companies Act, 1956, before this High Court. Advertisements were published as per direction of the court. Notice was served upon the Central Government through the Regional Direc
Sarguja Transport Service v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Gwalior
Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd. v. Union of India
Burn Standard Co. Ltd. v. McDermott International Inc.
Referred to : Dr. Ashis Ranjan Das v. Rajendra Nath Mullick
Krashnkumar Balakram Pande v. Municipal Corporation of the City of Baroda
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.