SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Guj) 13

P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN, P.M.CHAUHAN
Krashnkumar Balakram Pande – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corpn. of the City of Baroda – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: G.N.DESAI

P. R. GOKULAKRISHNAN, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge (Coram : A. P. Ravani, J.) dt. Nov. 23, 1988 passed in special civil application No. 5662 of 1988. The Special Civil Application is for directing the respondents to pay the amount of reward at the rate of 10% of the recoverable amount from the Company as per Annexure l to the special civil application with interest and declaring the action of the respondents regarding non-payment of reward to the petitioner as arbitrary, capricious, whimsical and illegal. There is a further prayer for declaring the order of respondent No. 2 bearing No. 3599 dt. Nov. 21, 1987, Annexure n to the special civil application, as null and void and declaring the same as unconstitutional, illegal and fabricated on non-existing and irrelevant grounds.

( 2 ) THE Short facts of the case for the purpose of disposal of this Letters patent Appeal are that the appellant seems to have given information to the Municipal Corporation, Baroda, by letter dt. 10-10-85, Annexure e to the special civil application, regarding the octroi evasion. In this letter the appellant has stated that M/s. Gujarat Comm













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top