SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 414

High Court Of Calcutta
SAMARESH BANERJEE, S. P. TALUKDAR
RITA DE CHOWDHURI - Appellant
Versus
KALYAN DE CHOWDHURI - Respondent
FIRST APPEAL 198  Of  2001
Decided On : 08/14/2003

A wife's refusal to return to the matrimonial home is justified if she is subjected to mental torture by her mother-in-law, and the husband fails to provide a separate residence for her.

Headnote:

RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS - CRUELTY - MENTAL TORTURE - WIFE'S REFUSAL TO RETURN TO MATRIMONIAL HOME - JUSTIFIABLE - HUSBAND'S FAILURE TO PROVIDE SEPARATE RESIDENCE - DECREE FOR RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS SET ASIDE.

Fact of the Case:

Wife alleged mental cruelty by mother-in-law, left matrimonial home, and filed for maintenance and a criminal case under Sections 498A/406 of the Indian Penal Code. Husband filed for restitution of conjugal rights, claiming wife left without reasonable cause.

Finding of the Court:

Wife's evidence of mental torture by mother-in-law was credible. Wife's refusal to return to the matrimonial home was justified due to the mother-in-law's behavior. Husband failed to provide a separate residence for his wife, despite her willingness to live with him. The wife had no intention to withdraw from the society of her husband and did not voluntarily leave the matrimonial home.

Issues: 1. Whether the wife's refusal to return to the matrimonial home was justified due to mental torture by the mother-in-law? 2. Whether the husband's failure to provide a separate residence for his wife constituted a reasonable excuse for her to stay away from the matrimonial home?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. Mental cruelty by the mother-in-law can constitute a reasonable excuse for the wife to leave the matrimonial home. 2. The husband has a duty to provide a separate residence for his wife if she is subjected to mental torture by his parents.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the judgment and order dated 10th August, 2000, which was under challenge before the court, was set aside, and the petition praying for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by the respondent/husband before the learned Trial Court was dismissed.

TALUKDAR, J.

( 1 ) THE parties in the present appeal i. e. the appellant, smt. Rita De Chowdhuri and the respondent Sri Kalyan De Chowdhuri, are hereinafter referred to as 'a/r' and 'r/k' respectively. R/k as petitioner, filed an application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Learned Court of District Judge at Burdwan being Matrimonial Case no. 370 of 1997.

( 2 ) GRIEVANCES, as ventilated in the said application, may briefly be stated as follows : marriage between the parties took place on 10th day of August, 1995 and it was duly solemnised according to Hindu rites and customs. After marriage the parties started living together as husband and wife. The marriage was duly consummated. Sister of r/k was already married. The parties started living at R/k's place with his parents. His father is a medical practitioner. R/k is a member of West Bengal Health Department. He was attached to Kalna Sub-Divisional hospital at the time of filing of the application. His mother is an old ailing lady. A/r developed hostile attitude towards the parents of R/k and started insisting for separate residence. She even started behaving in a cruel manner and became increasingly disrespectful towards the parents of her husband. She became pregnant and since then, her anxiety for a separate residence intensified and she further insisted her husband to reside with her at her father's place at Chandannagore, District-Hooghly. The couple became pleasantly burdened with a male child on 4th of October, 1996. R/k and his parents were naturally very happy. He used to visit his child quite frequently and also used to pay towards all sorts of expenses. He requested his wife to return to his place at Kalna when the child was about four months old. His wife straightway refused to return to her matrimonial home and she asked him to arrange for separate living. She was supported by her parents in such unreasonable insistence. R/k was not in a position to desert his old and ailing parents. His wife and her parents arranged the rice taking ceremony (Annaprasan) at Chandannagore on 10th April, 1997 to utter shock and surprise of R/k and his parents. He repeatedly requested his wife to come back to her matrimonial home along with the child but to no avail. His wife issued a letter under registered post wherein she claimed separate residence as well as maintenance and other reliefs. He received the letter and further requested his wife to return to her matrimonial home and restore the marital tie. He occasionally remitted money which, however, were refused. Since 13th April, 1997, A/r withdrew herself from the society of her husband without any reasonable cause of bona fide excuse and thus, deserted him. In the circumstances he filed the said case praying for a decree for restitution of conjugal right.

( 3 ) THE said case was contested by the present appellant as defendant. Written statement was filed on her behalf wherein all the material allegations made in the application were denied. She denied that her parents-in-law were cordial towards her. She alleged that her mother-in-law with in a few days of her marriage expressed that she was not willing to give marriage of her son with her. She also stated that her mother-in-law used to inflict unbearable mental torture in different forms. It was denied that she voluntarily left her matrimonial home or that she decided to have her first child delivered while staying at her father's place or that she along with her parents arranged the rice taking ceremony of her son at her father's place thereby ignoring the sentiment of her husband and his parents. She also denied that her husband or anybody on his behalf ever went to chandannagore to bring her back to her matrimonial home. She denied that she ever insisted her husband to live at her father's place at chandannagore. According to her she did not voluntarily withdraw herself from the society of her husband and deserted him on and from 13th April, 1































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top