SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 661

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
SANJIT CHAKRABORTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DILIP DE, DILIP SAMANTA, MALA DUTTA

B. BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) BY this writ application, the writ petitioner, an existing permit holder, has prayed for direction upon the Secretary, Transport Department and the Secretary, State Transport Authority to dispose of the objection raised by the petitioner against issue of Stage Carriage Permits in the routes covering the area within the regions of Jalpaiguri and Darjeeling by the State Transport Authority.

( 2 ) MR. De, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State/respondent, has raised a preliminary objection as regards maintainability of the instant writ application on the ground of absence of locus standi of the petitioner, an existing permit holder, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Mithilesh Garg v. Union of India and Anr. , reported in AIR 1992 SC 443. According to Mr. De, the petitioner, an existing permit holder, cannot dispute the grant of permit to other permit holder in the route even if the same is in contravention of the provisions contained in Motor Vehicles Act.

( 3 ) MR. Samanta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, has opposed the aforesaid contention of Mr. De and has contended that the petitioner










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top