SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 20

AMITAVA LALA
EVEREADY INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, Jalpaiguri – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ABHIJIT CHATTERJI, ANIL GUPTA, C.M.GHORAVAT

A. LALA, J.

( 1 ) IT appears to this Court that the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Jalpaiguri, in the order impugned directed the petitioners to pay certain amount for the period March 1989 to September 1997 and October 1997 to February 1998.

( 2 ) IT further appears from the figures that the claim amount is Rs. 68,43,066/- and Rs. 1,94,884/- respectively totalling to Rs. 70,37,950/ -. After giving particulars of the figure derived from the order impugned, the concerned authority stated that the amount of damages should be paid by the aforesaid employer/petitioner company in the respective Employees Provident Fund accounts maintained by the bank within a period of 15 days failing which a proceeding for recovery of such sums will be made under section 8 of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. It was also directed that in case of failure to deposit and penal damages within the stipulated period, section 7q of the Act for further simple interest will be added. The petitioner company invoked the writ jurisdiction without preferring appeal by saying that alternative remedy is no bar in the facts and circumstances of this case.

( 3 ) ACCORDING t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top