SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 334

AMITAVA LALA
BENGAL IMMUNITY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MUKUL KUMAR KAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P.MAJUMDAR, Gopal Dutt

AMITAVA LALA, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is made by the petitioner company virtually for the purpose of restraining the respondents from proceeding with the criminal case being M624 pending before the respondent No. 3 and withdraw, recall and rescind the certificate and/or the criminal proceeding and order passed therein amongst other prayers which are virtually connected therein.

( 2 ) THE petitioner contended that the company is now constituted under Bengal immunity Company Limited (Acquisition and transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1984. By reason of the same right, title and interest of the erstwhile company stood transferred to and vest in the Central Government with effect from 1/10/1984. The nationalisation Act provides appointment of Commissioner of; payments for disbursing the claimed amounts against the erstwhile company. Such company is presently sick when an application being case No. 538 of 1992 is registered with BIFR (Board for Industrial and Financial; reconstruction ). On September 13, 2002 a review hearing was fixed by such Board on rehabilitation of sanctioned in 1985.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, the respondent No. 1 was initially appointed by the original


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top