SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 361

ALTAMAS KABIR, ALOK KUMAR BASU
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
BISWANATH TEA CO LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.DAVE, Debi Prasad Pal, M.SEAL, P.K.MULLICK

ALTAMAS KABIR, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal-II, Calcutta, arises out of the order of the Tribunal in I. T. A. No. 1514 (Cal) of 1992, for this court's view on the following question of law :"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in deleting the disallowance made under Section 37 (4), the guest house expenditure without giving any specific finding ?"

( 2 ) AS will appear from the statement of the case, the Assessing Officer had disallowed a sum of Rs. 9,96,677 on account of guest-house maintenance under Section 37 (4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Aggrieved thereby, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) on the ground that only a sum of Rs. 4,55,630, which had already been included in the return, had been disallowed under Section 37 (4) of the above Act and the amount of Rs. 4,86,631 had not been disallowed under Section 37 (4), inasmuch as, the same was allowable under Sections 30 and 31. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld the Assessing Officer's view and dis
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top