SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Cal) 497

BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE, A.K.SENGUPTA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
TUNGABHADRA INDUSTRIES LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.KHAITAN, R.N.BAJORIA, Sunil Mitra

AJIT K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THERE are two consolidated references for the assessment year 1984-85 made by the Tribunal under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, one at the instance of the assessee and the other at the instance of the Revenue. At the instance of the Revenue, the following question of law has been referred to this court :"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the sum of Rs. 4 lakhs payable as premium is allowable revenue expenditure over a period of seven years and, therefore, for the assessment year 1984-85, one-seventh of the sum of Rs. 4 lakhs should be allowed as a deduction ?"

( 2 ) THE following questions of law have been referred at the instance of the assessee :"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee was entitled to a deduction of Rs. 57,643 only and not of the entire amount of Rs. 4 lakhs being premium payable on debentures in computation of its income for the assessment year 1984-85 ?2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the expenditure of






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top