AMITAVA LALA
EASTERN TRADING CO. – Appellant
Versus
UCO BANK – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE writ petitions were made for the common purpose. Therefore, the Court was pleased to direct to hear out all the writ petitions analogously. Several applications were also made in connection with the main writ petition. However, by making these writ petitions, petitioners wanted cancellation and/or withdrawal of a notice under seal and signature of the Estate Officer under sub section (1) and Clause (b) (iii) of sub section (2) of section 4 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. The notice in the nature of show cause is issued to give reply why the eviction should not be made to the respective petitioners. It is apparent that the respective petitioners were called upon in person or through a duly authorized representative capable to answer material questions connected with the matter along with the evidence which is intended to be produced in support of the cause shown at a personal hearing and a further notice was given that in case of failure the matter will be proceeded ex-parte. The grounds cited in the notice are as follows: 1. Reasonable and bonafide own use by the Bank; 2. Sub-letting, assigning whole or part of the occ
M/s. Safari Airways v. The Estate Officer and Ors.
REFERRED TO : Union of India and Anr. v. Amrik Singh and Ors.
Damodar Valley Corporation and Ors. v. Damodar Valley Corporation Displaced Employees Union
Sugandha Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. A.K. Saha and Anr.
Ashoka Marketing Ltd. and Anr. v. Punjab National Bank and Ors.
Union of India and Anr. v. Charanjit S. Gill and Ors.
Barium Chemicals Ltd. and Anr. v. Company Law Board and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.