SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Cal) 252

A.K.MATHUR, J.K.BISWAS
SABARNA ROYCHOWDHURY PARIBAR PARISHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT PANJA, ALOKE GHOSH, BALAI ROY, Sarajit Roy chowdhury

A. K. MATHUR, CJ.

( 1 ) THIS is a Public Interest Litigation whereby two questions of historical importance have been raised i. e. what is the date of birth of the City of Calcutta (now renamed as "kolkata") and whether 'job Charnayak' was the founder of this city.

( 2 ) SINCE both these two questions raise a serious question of the history and the Court felt that it would not be proper for this Court to undertake this exercise, therefore, this Court by an order dated 12th April, 2002 appointed an expert committee to go into these quetstions. The order dated 12th April, 2002 reads as follows:"the Court: By an order dated 5th April, 2002, a committee of the following persons was constituted to go into the question whether Job Charnayak was a founder of Calcutta or not, what is the date of birth of Calcutta and who was the founder:-1. Prof. Nemai Sadhan Bose, 2. Prof. Barun De, 3. Prof. Pradip Sinha, 4. Prof. Arun Kumar Dasgupta, 5. Prof. Sushil Chowdhury. All the five professors were contacted by the Registrar General and they have kindly consented to be the member of the Committee. Let this committee be formed and give their findings on the following two questions:-1. What is the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top