High Court Of Calcutta
Maharaj Sinha
BENGAL BRICKFIELDS OWNERS ASSOCIATION - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
C. O. 12407 (W) Of 1990
Decided On : 10/30/2003
LAND REFORMS - Section 4C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Validity - Brickfields - Regulation and Development - Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Central Government - Exclusive Legislative Competence - State Government - No Legislative Competence - Notification issued by State Government - Prohibiting mining operation of brickfields without conversion certificates - Violative of Entry 54 List I and Articles 245 and 246 of the Constitution of India - Struck down.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, an association of brickfield owners and individual brickfield owners, challenged a notification issued by the West Bengal Government prohibiting the mining operation of brickfields without conversion certificates. The petitioners contended that the State Government lacked the legislative competence to control and cover the brickfields and the minor minerals by legislation in view of the prohibition made in Entry 54 List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the impugned notification was issued in violation of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, and the West Bengal Minor Minerals Rules, 1973 and in violation of the prohibition made in Entry 54 List I Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. The Court further held that the State Government had no legal authority to issue such notification dated 30th October, 1986, in the first place.
Issues: 1. Whether the State Government had the legislative competence to control and cover the brickfields and the minor minerals by legislation in view of the prohibition made in Entry 54 List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India? 2. Whether the impugned notification was issued in violation of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, and the West Bengal Minor Minerals Rules, 1973?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court relied on the decisions in Shyam Sundar Rathi vs. Additional District Magistrate, Bankura and Ors., AIR 1975 Calcutta 58 and Chandreswar Prasad Singh and Anr. vs. Sub-Divisional Land Reforms Officer and Ors., AIR 1986 Calcutta 1, to hold that the State Government had no legislative competence to control and cover the brickfields and the minor minerals by legislation in view of the prohibition made in Entry 54 List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. 2. The Court held that the impugned notification was issued in violation of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, and the West Bengal Minor Minerals Rules, 1973 and in violation of the prohibition made in Entry 54 List I Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.
Final Decision: The Court quashed the impugned notification and declared that the State Government had no legal authority to issue such notification dated 30th October, 1986, in the first place.
( 1 ) IN this writ application, a notification issued by the government of West Bengal, being Memo No. 9503 (16)-M and M dated 30th october, 1986, is under challenge. A copy of the said notification is the only annexure, being marked 'a', to the writ application.
( 2 ) THE present writ application was, in fact, moved way back in the year 1990, to be precise, on 23rd November, 1990. when a learned Single Judge, His lordship Justice Kalyanmoy Ganguly (as His Lordship then was), was pleased to give directions for filing affidavits in the presence of the learned Advocates for both the petitioners and the State respondents.
( 3 ) HIS Lordship Justice Ganguly was also pleased to pass an interim order directing the respondents to allow the petitioners extracting earth on payment of usual assessed royalty. Liberty was also granted to the petitioners by the learned Judge to amend the prayer portion of the petition by adding a prayer therein. On that basis there was also an interim order in terms of the amended prayer - 'f' of the writ petition till the disposal of the writ application.
( 4 ) BY the said interim order in terms of Prayer-'f', the concerned respondents were restrained by way of an injunction from "taking any step and/or further step on the basis of section 4c of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, as amended and the respondents were further directed to allow the petitioners to extract earth on payment of usual assessed royalty till the disposal of the writ petition.
( 5 ) BY virtue of the above interim order, made way back in the year 1990, the interests of the writ petitioner herein, were and have since been protected and are still being protected.
( 6 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the text of the said impugned notification dated 30th October, 1986, is set out below :"notification after issue of Commerce and Industries Deptt's Notification No. 5955-CI/ mines dated 27. 07. 85 amending Rule 4 of the West Bengal Minor Minerals rules, 1973 extraction of minor minerals has been prohibited in any land classified in revenue records as agricultural land, orchard or forest. Now a question has been raised as to whether agricultural land in respect of which quarry permit has already been granted by the Collector for the purpose of extraction of minor mineral before issue of Commerce and Industries Deptt's notification No. 5955-CI/mines dated 27. 07. 85 shall come under the purview of amended Rule 4 of the West Bengal Minor Minerals Rules, 1973. The matter has been duly considered by the Board of Revenue in consultation with the Commerce and Industries Deptt of this Government and it has been decided that agricultural lands in respect of which valid quarry permits had already been granted by the Collector before 27. 07. 1985 i. e. the date on which amended Rule 4 of West Bengal Minor Minerals Rules, 1973 came into force shall not come under the purview of this rule as the classification of the subject land has virtually been changed by non-agricultural use. In cases of old brickfield and sand quarries on agricultural lands as stated above which have existing sanction the Collector may issue quarry permits after conversion of such land in accordance with the provisions of section 4c of the West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendment) Act,1981 and after due observance of the conditions as laid down in Rules 24,26 and 31 of the West bengal Minor Minerals Rules, 1973. "
( 7 ) THE first writ petitioner, it appears, is the association of Bengal Brickfield owners which is a non-profit making organization and was incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. The 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and the 6th petitioners herein, are all individual brickfield owners and also Members of the said Organization and the 4th respondent is the honorary Secretary of the said association.
( 8 ) FROM the 2nd paragraph of the writ petition it appears that the first petitioner, being the association, has more than 1,000 membe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.