SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 152

SUKUMAR CHAKRAVARTY
M/S. ARPEE PROPERTIES PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
UNITED BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.P.TIVARI, PRADIP GHOSH, Tapan Kumar Banerjee, TARUN CHATTEJEE

SUKUMAR CHAKRAVARTY, J.


( 1 ) THE caveat having been lodged, this revisional application has been heard as a contested application. In this revisional application the plaintiff/petitioner has challenged the order dated 13-3-85 passed by the learned Judge 8th Bench in charge of 12th Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta, rejecting on the ground of maintainability, the plaintiff's application under S. 151 Civil Procedure Code for setting aside the order dated 14-8-84 whereby the application under O. 39, R. 4 of Civil Procedure Code filed by the opposite parties Nos. 2 and 3 was allowed ex prate and the ad interim order of injunction already granted was vacated, and for rehearing the petition under O. 39, R. 4 Civil Procedure Code.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff brought the Title Suit No. 660 of 1984 against the opposite party-defendants and filed an application under O. 39, Rr. 1 and 2, Civil Procedure Code for temporary injunction restraining the defendant No. 1 (United Bank of India) from making payment to the extent of Rs. 52,200/being the amount of two cheques to the defendant No. 2 (M/s. Navin Trading Corporation) or the defendant No. 3 (B. N. Jaiswal) the proprietor of M/s. Navin Trading Cor

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top