SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 310

JITENDRA NATH CHAUDHURI, M.M.DUTT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, U. S. M. WORKS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SUJATA ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHIT KUMAR BHATTACHARJEE, BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA

M. M. DUTT, J.

( 1 ) THIS application under S. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed at the instance of the defendants, the Executive Director of Usha Sewing Machine Works Ltd. , and the Jay Engineering Works Ltd. , is directed against Order No. 66 dated Nov. 12,1984 of the 3rd Court of the Assistant District Judge, Alipore passed in the Suit No. 52 of 1981. By the said order, the learned Assistant District Judge allowed the application for substitution of the heirs of the deceased plaintiff No. 2 Birendra Chandra Roy.

( 2 ) THE said suit was instituted by the said Birendra Chandra Roy, since deceased, and the plaintiff No. 1 Sha Sha Bindu Roy, who were employees of Jay Engineering Works ltd. , inter alia, praying for a declaration that the notices of their superannuation before their attaining the age of 60 years were illegal, inoperative and void; for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from in any way interfering with plaintiffs' services under the defendant company; for a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to withdraw and/or rescind the notices of retirement and for damages on the basis of total emoluments on and from the first day of Jan. 1981, ti













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top