SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Cal) 109

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, A.K.SENGUPTA
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX – Appellant
Versus
MIRA MEHTA – Respondent


AJIT K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) AT the instance of the Commissioner of Wealth-tax, the Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this court, for the assessment years 1976-77 and 1977-78, under Section 27 (1) of the W. T. Act, 1957:"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 5 (1) (iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, in respect of property belonging to the firm ?"

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are stated hereunder : The assessee is a partner in a partnership firm. The partners originally were the members of the same family. The house property in which the partners were residing was owned by the partners. It was treated as the property of the firm which is carrying on business. In the wealth-tax assessment of the assessee, exemption was claimed in respect of the said house property on the ground that the assessee had been residing there even though the property formed a part of the assets of the partnership firm. The justification for making such a claim is that the property continued to belong to the assessee inasmuch as the partnership is nothing but a compendious name for a group of persons joining together for








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top