SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Cal) 216

SATISH CHANDRA, MUKUL GOPAL MUKHERJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
MRS. MOKTAR BEGUM AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.MOITRA, Debi Pal, J.C.SAHA, Mihirlal Bhattacharji, SAMAD

SATTSH CHANDRA, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference made at the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred several questions. But the crucial question of law arising out of the Tribunal's order is whether the business income earned by a proprietary concern owned by a Muslim widow and her minor children could be assessed in the status of an association of persons.

( 2 ) FOR the assessment year 1966-67, the Income-tax Officer assessed the income of the concern in the status of an association of persons. This view was upheld by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, but was reversed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the assessment was properly to be made on the widow as a representative assessee, under Section 161 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

( 3 ) ONE Imam Ahmed Khan carried on the business as a whole saler in fish, under the name and style of "fida Hossain and Co. " as its sole proprietor. He died on March 3, 1960. He left behind his widow, Mrs. Moktar Begum, and seven minor children. The widow continued the same business in the same name and style. The profits of the business were, at the end of each year, credited in the respective accounts of the widow
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top