SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Raj) 258

MODI
Ali Mohammad – Appellant
Versus
Ram Niwas – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hasti Mal Parikh, for Ali Mohammad; R.K. Rastogi, for Ramniwas and another

MODI, J.—These are two connected appeals which arise out of the judgment and decree of the learned District Judge, Jhunjhunu dated the 18th of October, 1960 in a suit for redemption of a mortgage. Appeal No. 125 of 1961 has been filed by the mortgagor Ali Mohammad while Appeal No. 144 of 1961 by the mortgees. I propose to dispose of both these appeals by a single judgment.

2. It is common ground between the parties that the plaintiff Ali Mohammad along with his mother Mst. Laxmi made a mortgage of the two shops in suit in favour of the defendants to secure a loan of Rs. 1565/- by a registered mortgage deed dated 22nd August, 1927 vide Ex. A-3. The mortgage was of a usufructuary character. The plaintiff, therefore, claimed to redeem the shops in suit on payment of the mortgage money amounting to Rs. 1565/-. The defendants resisted the suit. In addition to the mortgage-deed Ex. A-3 they urged that by another document Ex. A-l dated Kati Sudi 9, Smt. 1987 corresponding to some time in November, 1931, the mortgagor and his mother Laxmi had sold the roof (or as it is stated in the document Dagla) on his shops to them. It appears from the document that there was a medi on the top of the sh




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top