SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Cal) 270

M.K.MUKHERJEE, SUDHANSHU SEKHAR GANGULY
M/S. N. P. C. CORPN. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S. S. P. ENTERPRISE (P) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.R.CHATTERJI, TARUN CHATTEJEE

SUDHANSHU SEKHAR GANGULY, J.

( 1 ) THE present matter arises out of an application under S. 115 of the Civil P. C.

( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY in terms of a contract of earth filling the opposite party executed some work for the petitioner 1 and her bills, to a considerable extent, remained unpaid. The contract contained an arbitration clause, being clause 16 and invoking the same the opposite party submitted an application, registered as Misc. Case No. 27 of 1987 before the learned Assistant District Judge, 3rd Court, Alipore under S. 8 (2) of the Arbitration Act for the appointment of an Arbitrator. The petitioner 1 contested the said application. It was urged by the petitioner 1 first that on the selfsame ground the opposite party submitted another application before the learned Judge - being Misc. Case No. 2 of 1987 - which was dismissed on contest on 18-5-87 and the review application being Misc. Case No. 19 of 1987 in respect of the same remaining pending, the instant application was barred by res judicata. It was also urged that the present application was not maintainable since the opposite party instituted T. S. No. 234 of 1986 for filing of the Arbitration Agreement under S. 20 (4










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top