SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Cal) 185

AJIT KUMAR NAYAK
H. P. NATHANI – Appellant
Versus
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DIPAK ROY, DIPTI MITRA, SUBAL CHANDRA MOITRA, SUBIR BANERJI, SUBRATA BOSE

A. K. NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional petition under Section 401 read with Section 482, Cr. P. C. is directed against an order dated 3. 4. 85, passed by learned Chief Judge, City Sessions Court, Calcutta, in criminal appeal No, 34 of 1984 whereby the learned Judge allowed the appeal in part, upholding and confirming the sentence of conviction against two accused petitioners passed by Metropolitan Magistrate, 5th Court, Calcutta, but modifying the amount of fine that was to be paid by the accused-petitioner.

( 2 ) THE complainant-opposite party State Insurance Corporation brought this case against the accused-petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 the Directors, and accused petitioner No. 3 (whose name has been deleted subsequently in this petition) the Manager of the factory, Shiva Glass Works Co. Ltd. , as the principal employers, for their failure to submit contribution cards for the period 24. 11. 79 and 26. 1. 80, which should have been submitted according to the complainant on or before 5. 1. 80 and 7. 3. 80, respectively. Allegedly the accused petitioners were also convicted previously for similar such offence in 1975. The accused petitioners by such non-submission of contribution cards a









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top